For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser. Avoid These Common Pitfalls During a Capital Raise: A Cautionary Guide - Multifamily Investing Mastermind
MIH Mastermind

Avoid These Common Pitfalls During a Capital Raise: A Cautionary Guide


When raising capital, it’s essential to recognize and avoid common pitfalls that can jeopardize the process. Certain topics, if discussed inappropriately, can lead to significant complications. This guide outlines critical areas to be cautious about, helping ensure that your capital-raising efforts remain on solid ground.

One of the primary mistakes observed during capital raises is the tendency to provide advice in areas where expertise is lacking, particularly in tax, legal, and investment matters. While these topics are often integral to discussions surrounding capital raises, offering specific advice can lead to unintended consequences. It is important to understand that advice on these topics should be left to professionals who are equipped to handle them.

For instance, discussing tax-related topics, such as depreciation, can be particularly challenging. Depreciation, especially in the context of passive investments, is a complex issue. Passive losses generated from such investments can typically only offset passive gains unless the investor qualifies as a real estate professional. In that case, those passive losses may be treated as active losses. Because of the technical nature and the variability of individual tax situations, providing tax advice without a thorough understanding of the investor’s circumstances can be misleading and potentially harmful.

Therefore, it is advisable to refrain from giving tax advice and instead encourage investors to consult with their accountants. Similarly, when it comes to legal advice, it’s important to avoid making any legal assessments, as these should be handled by qualified legal professionals. The same caution applies to investment advice—without a detailed understanding of an investor’s personal situation, it’s impossible to provide informed guidance. Making claims that a particular investment opportunity is ideal for their circumstances without proper analysis can be both unethical and legally risky.

In summary, during a capital raise, it is crucial to steer clear of offering tax, legal, or investment advice. Always include standard disclaimers, clarifying that you are not acting as their accountant, lawyer, or financial advisor. By doing so, the integrity of the capital-raising process is preserved, and potential liabilities are minimized.

Understanding Solicitation Rules During a Capital Raise
In the realm of capital raising, particularly when dealing with traditional methods such as syndications and securities, it’s essential to understand the regulations that govern these activities. Specifically, when raising capital through securities, entities must either go public or qualify for an exemption from doing so. One of the most common exemptions utilized is under Regulation D, which includes Rule 506(b) and Rule 506(c).

A frequent question arises regarding what can and cannot be communicated during a capital raise under Rule 506(b), which is widely used. The key restriction to be aware of is the prohibition against general solicitation. General solicitation refers to the act of promoting or advertising a capital raise to the public. This means that when raising funds under a 506(b) exemption, it is critical not to publicly announce that funds are being raised for a specific deal. Furthermore, some legal professionals advise against even mentioning that you are raising capital, as this could be interpreted as general solicitation.

However, it is important to distinguish between what is restricted and what is permitted under Rule 506(b). While discussing specific deals publicly is prohibited, marketing yourself or your business is allowed. This means that you can share information about your business, the types of deals you typically handle, and your track record without violating the exemption. It’s crucial, however, to avoid crossing the line into discussing the specifics of any ongoing deal, as this could breach the 506(b) rules.

On the other hand, Rule 506(c) offers more flexibility in this regard. Under 506(c), general solicitation is allowed, meaning you can publicly share details about a specific deal, including aspects such as the unit type, target internal rate of return (IRR), and where potential investors can find more information. This exemption provides greater freedom in communication, but it’s important to ensure compliance with the specific rules associated with 506(c).

Understanding the distinctions between these exemptions and adhering to the relevant regulations is crucial for maintaining compliance during a capital raise.

 

The Importance of Disclaimers and Conservative Language in Capital Raising
When discussing previous deals, track records, and past returns to investors, these elements can be incredibly powerful marketing tools. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the creators of exemption rules are fully aware of this. Consequently, when referencing past performance, it is crucial to consistently use the disclaimer: “Past performance is not indicative of future results.” This statement is more than a formality; it is a legal safeguard that protects against potential claims of misleading promises or guarantees.

If a deal does not perform as expected, investors who experience losses may seek legal recourse. In such situations, attorneys representing these investors will meticulously examine all communications and marketing materials to determine whether any promises or guarantees were made, especially concerning the return of the original investment. Therefore, it is essential to separate past success from expectations for current or future deals, clearly stating that past performance should not be seen as a predictor of future outcomes.

In marketing materials, it is advisable to avoid using the term “projections” and instead adopt the term “target.” The shift from “projections” to “target” aligns more closely with terminology used in the institutional and broker-dealer communities, and it provides a more accurate representation of the goals in a given deal. The word “target” implies an objective that the deal aims to achieve, without the implication of certainty that “projections” might suggest.

For investors conducting due diligence, language plays a critical role in their perception of the operator. It is important to convey that the operator is committed to delivering on promises, but not by overselling or making unrealistic claims. The use of conservative language helps build a narrative that portrays the operator as someone who is cautious and prudent, putting investors’ interests first. This approach includes setting targets that are reasonable and defensible rather than overly optimistic.

By consistently using conservative language, such as referring to “target returns” instead of “projections,” and by reiterating standard disclaimers, operators can build trust with investors. This trust is further reinforced when the operator takes steps to ensure that any buffers in the financial projections are in favor of the investor, demonstrating a commitment to conservative and responsible management of their investments.

The Importance of Disclosures in Capital Raising: Protecting Your Reputation and Your Investors

Incorporating clear and consistent disclosures into your language and marketing materials is not just a legal necessity—it’s a strategic advantage in capital raising. Regularly emphasizing that you are not a tax accountant, not providing legal advice, and not offering investment advice reinforces your professionalism. Moreover, consistently reminding investors that past performance is not indicative of future results and that projections should be understood as targets further enhances your credibility. This transparency elevates your status in the eyes of investors, positioning you as a conscientious and trustworthy operator.

Using these disclaimers effectively communicates that while every effort is made to achieve the best possible outcomes, there are inherent risks in any investment. By acknowledging these risks upfront and stating that certain factors are beyond your control, you manage investor expectations realistically. This level of honesty not only protects you legally but also strengthens the relationship with your investors by building trust through clear communication.

While this approach might seem daunting, it’s important to remember that transparency and caution do not hinder your ability to raise capital. On the contrary, they contribute to a more robust and sustainable capital-raising strategy. When you clearly articulate the risks and uncertainties, investors are more likely to appreciate your candor and view you as a reliable partner who values their interests. This trust is invaluable, especially when deals do not perform as expected.

Moreover, incorporating these disclosures can provide peace of mind. By ensuring that your communications and marketing materials include these disclaimers, you reduce the likelihood of misunderstandings or legal challenges should a deal go sideways. This proactive approach helps avoid sleepless nights worrying about whether something said or written might be taken out of context.

In conclusion, by being mindful of what you say, particularly when dealing with a 506(b) exemption, and by including necessary disclaimers, you set yourself up for success. This practice not only protects you legally but also enhances your reputation, allowing you to raise capital with greater confidence and integrity.

With these guidelines in place, may your efforts to raise capital be both fruitful and secure.

Disclaimer: This information is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute tax or legal advice. Readers should consult with their own professional advisors for tailored guidance.